Did you read wiki?
This is a Hitskin.com skin preview
Install the skin • Return to the skin page
This is a Hitskin.com skin preview
Install the skin • Return to the skin page
Hassan I wrote:Ok Ahmed, so as I understand, you are saying that because of the fact that Muslims and Europeans met and mingled, all of these violences are occuring, right?
I disagree that the meeting, or the Clash, is responsible for the genocide. Reason: The fact that Muslims are being killed is because, 1) we are weak in military terms, 2) we lack organization and unity. and 3) we allow these things to happen.
No nation in the world can dare to touch Saudia Arabia because if it does, all the Muslims in the world will stand against them. But unfortunately, they allow attacks on Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia, and even Kashmir due to their division. It is this age which is responsible for the deaths, not the clash.
And furthermore, if you define Clash as we did, Muslim invasion and takover of Spain was another example of it, way before the crusades. How do you think there was peace in the Kingdom of Geranada for 700 years?
I repeat that I beieve in Taqdeer, and therefore, it had to happen.
Hassan I wrote:Before everything else Ahmed, the defination you are using of Clash is suppose to be of the post Cold War era, and it was a theory purposed in 1993, only about 15 years ago!
Hassan I wrote:I say that Clash was due to the Cold War and its end because the defination of it is meant to be implied after 1993. If I include stuff before it, then it would go under Cultural diffusion. (as with the Reconquista of Spain).
|
|