Re: Should women be allow to be top less legaly in public?

by **Ahmed** Thu Jul 01, 2010 9:42 pm

That means the debate is over.

Good Night fool. Dream of topless women now.

by **Hassan** Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:34 pm

Good night...tat's not nice, Ahmed, chill...

by **Ahmed** Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:40 pm

Did you see his comment? He said that at school before too!!!

Well it doesn't bother me obviously but w/e....and I was just kidding with him...lol

by **Hassan** Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:43 pm

ok...I think I understand

by IR Fri Jul 02, 2010 1:08 am

I will vote for should NOT allow b/c I would be really really embarrass if I walking topless Hilarious

by **Ahmed** Fri Jul 02, 2010 1:21 am

Exactly...because its private Wink

by **Hassan** Fri Jul 02, 2010 8:04 am

good point IR, that's the social contract we have to abide by as we live in a society.

by **Fangy** Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:29 am

preid1220 wrote:it is in my opinion that showing flesh in areas other than the head, neck, arms, hands, and legs is immoral and leads to perverted thoughts... with the acceptation of feet. I just dont like feet.

Foot fetish lolol.

Tbh, I think any part of your body that you can have an orgasm with shouldn't be shown.

by **Dark Flame99966** Fri Jul 02, 2010 12:43 pm

You can't have an orgasm with your breasts, neither man nor woman.
Also, IR, just because you're embarrassed about it why can't other women who aren't go topless? I mean, there are men who are just as embarrassed because they're fat or something and then the guys with abs go off and show it off

by **Ahmed** Fri Jul 02, 2010 12:45 pm

It's immoral. I really don't know why you guys are arguing Mellow

No morals would mean that we are animals. This isn't sexism. This is immoral.

by **Dark Flame99966** Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:15 pm

It's immoral to expose balls of fat?

by **Ahmed** Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:16 pm

That are seen as sexual...yes.

by **Dark Flame99966** Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:28 pm

Everything can be seen as sexual. There's hand fetish, there's foot fetish, there's lip fetishes...honestly, the only difference is there is a larger amount with breast fetish

by **The Banker** Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:30 pm

sorry Flame... get ur science right b4 arguing Rolling Eyes

by **Ahmed** Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:32 pm

Flame...those are sick people.

Men being attracted to a woman's breasts. As much as that sounds weird and sick...it's just natural...thats how all men are

But feet, hand? wtf

by **Hassan** Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:33 pm

this debate is getting wierder and wierder by the second indeed. I thought it was over already

by **Ahmed** Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:35 pm

Some people don't know when to stop, namely Lev and Flame.

by **Hassan** Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:36 pm

I think we are officially over with this, OK guys?

by **The Banker** Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:36 pm

^^ just lock this topic man....

by **Ahmed** Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:38 pm

Am I allowed to lock this? I mean no one broke the rules and the author didn't request to lock it.

Just leave it to die I guess.

by **Hassan** Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:49 pm

OK...but I hope it dies

by **The Banker** Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:53 pm

just nod and smile and they'll have no one to argue with.. lol

by **Dark Flame99966** Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:59 pm

My science is right though. There are fetishes for just about everything. Have you seen crush videos. Those are for fetishes.

by **The Banker** Fri Jul 02, 2010 5:08 pm

Dark Flame99966 wrote:It's immoral to expose balls of fat?

^^ reread it..
and i ain't gonna argue with u.

by **Justice** Fri Jul 02, 2010 5:35 pm

lock it (i know i won the argument) :p

by Sponsored content

Hitskin.com