Craig wrote:But what if the person that killed didn't know what they were doing. I mean with modern time kids make their own decisions, yes I understand that, but they also take lives without meaning to.
I think that for rape, they shouldn't be given death by the one who was raped. But instead they should be in deep trouble.
For any big offencive crime. I would perfer to have something like the main event in "The Hunger Games"
Dina wrote:I agree with Flame
I believe in death penalty, if you kill someone intentionally then you've lost any kind of humanity left in you & I don't think people should sympathize with this kind of person. besides, having a death penalty is like a warning sign for anyone who thinks that he's living in one big chaotic mess where he can go around killing & ending lives with no strict punishment to what he's done
preid1220 wrote:Dina wrote:I agree with Flame
I believe in death penalty, if you kill someone intentionally then you've lost any kind of humanity left in you & I don't think people should sympathize with this kind of person. besides, having a death penalty is like a warning sign for anyone who thinks that he's living in one big chaotic mess where he can go around killing & ending lives with no strict punishment to what he's done
and what if your case is not tried fairly? lets say you are accused for killing mr.blank, and are falsely convicted by a jury of your piers who simply want to get the case over with quickly and get on with there lives. Now you are dead and the true killer is caught on another case, would your death not be meaningless?
preid1220 wrote:Dina wrote:I agree with Flame
I believe in death penalty, if you kill someone intentionally then you've lost any kind of humanity left in you & I don't think people should sympathize with this kind of person. besides, having a death penalty is like a warning sign for anyone who thinks that he's living in one big chaotic mess where he can go around killing & ending lives with no strict punishment to what he's done
and what if your case is not tried fairly? lets say you are accused for killing mr.blank, and are falsely convicted by a jury of your piers who simply want to get the case over with quickly and get on with there lives. Now you are dead and the true killer is caught on another case, would your death not be meaningless?
Ahmed IV wrote:Well...then the death penalty should only happen if there is 100% true evidence.
You can just as easily ask for a judge to try your case and no jury, or try getting your conviction repealed. After that there's still a possibility and calling the conviction unconstitutional if you can bs your way to the Supreme Court. And you're usually on death row for around 5 years, it's so slow that by the time you're about to get killed, you can make another case for yourself.and what if your case is not tried fairly? lets say you are accused for killing mr.blank, and are falsely convicted by a jury of your piers who simply want to get the case over with quickly and get on with there lives. Now you are dead and the true killer is caught on another case, would your death not be meaningless?
Ahmed IV wrote:I saw the movieb of it pried...it was funny lol
read the bookAhmed IV wrote:Yeah that fat guy was angry and he started throwing paper balls at the fan lol
Ahmed IV wrote:Never! Movies FTW!
|
|
|
Portal