Right:
-He is a harm to himself
-He is a harm to others
Wrong:
-He deserves to live just like any other.
-Its not up to others, to relax him from his pains (craziness)
Ahmed IV wrote:
Why should a person die for something that's not up to his will?
Ahmed IV wrote:No, I think if you want to minimize the populationa bit, teach people about birth control rather than going and killing people.
Theory wrote:Ahmed IV wrote:No, I think if you want to minimize the populationa bit, teach people about birth control rather than going and killing people.
Having sex with a condom is about as much fun as brushing your teeth with a dry toothbrush....this knowledge is not from person experience
Besides, making more regulations on this will only make it more "exciting" to do it unprotected
Ahmed IV wrote:No, I think if you want to minimize the populationa bit, teach people about birth control rather than going and killing people.
Ahmed IV wrote:I know, but my poitn was that you don't need to kill people to slow down the quickly growing population. You just took that post and it seems you are startign a branch topic off of it.
Is this a sign of weakness on your part of the debate
Fang wrote:I'm against the death penalty altogether
Marwa wrote:yh it does remind me of "Of mice and men"
George had no right to kill Lenny, even if Lenny can't think 4 himself.
Marwa wrote:but what if someone killed someone else.... shouldn't they deserve to die??
Steve wrote:Marwa wrote:yh it does remind me of "Of mice and men"
George had no right to kill Lenny, even if Lenny can't think 4 himself.
George killed Lenny because curly was going to kill him, and curly would make him suffer where George killed him painlessly when he was doing his favourite thing.
AlsoMarwa wrote:but what if someone killed someone else.... shouldn't they deserve to die??
Lenny had killed someone else.
|
|