british corruption!!!!

@ Glory:: crap gov.. labour was in charge..
labour do have their pros.. and their cons.. the war part happens to be its cons..

@ sayf:: i would blame the gov... and their supporters
not every single british person...

And who the f bought them in power? The MAJORITY.

marwa yer hopeless

the majority of britons wud have to agree in order for such a law to to passed ... so ud hate the majority of britons ... so that would be the crusades, colonialism, terrorism, unjust laws, and banning stuff ...

@ Glory:: the majority were for a coalition gov with conservatives and lib dem

Sayfullah wrote:marwa yer hopeless

the majority of britons wud have to agree in order for such a law to to passed ... so ud hate the majority of britons ... so that would be the crusades, colonialism, terrorism, unjust laws, and banning stuff ...

fair enough.. i would hate 'em for it
BUT they didn't introduce such a law so yeah..

Yeah...so the majority wanted something yet it didn't happen...you are implying that England isn't a democracy, right?

Also did you read the rest of sayfs post? They agreed to all those other crimes.

it did happen... david cameron and nick clegg are in charge...

and they didn't agree to nought....

That's great, so you are saying that England is not a democracy.

And I'm guessing you are not going to reply to the rest of sayfs post.

You failed this debate.

tony blair (labour) started the war... Gordon brown (labour) finished it... david cameron and nick clegg (conservative & lib dem) are sorting it out

how is that not a democracy?? the one with da majority of votes won each time lol

also i replied.. re-read my post hun

Good good. So you are saying that the MAJORITY of the votes went to Balir who started the war. Goodthats what I have been saying.

Yes they agreed to all that stuff. One person won't come out and do radical things like the ones listed if he doesn't have major support.

yeah.. and look at the majority now... they ain't with labour

and i don't get ur last point..

Now, after the brits got their asses kicked, they want to leave the war. This is normal for losing country. Therefore that's not the issue or anyone cares about it. We are talking about 7 years ago.

Read sayfs post again.

the gov changed, and the ppl changed... so ur stuff about judging a country on gov, ppl ad history ain't right
=====
PS:: i can't believe i'm saying this... BUT imma let u win.
i'm totally convinced with my logic and ur totally convinced with urs... we're not gonna change each other's mind and debating with u is alwayz a pain in da neck..

congratz Glory.. *sigh*

dont be so quick to quit, this is getting funny.

dude.. 11 pages in a day and a half!!
i'm getting real tired of this

Preid shut the hell up please...

@Marwa:

"The people changed" ...nope they seem to be the same...the only difference is that they lost the war.

And its simple, you are just too hard headed/stubborn. That's why its a pain for you. You logic is flawed and you just stick with it no matter what.

Glory wrote:Preid shut the hell up please...

@Marwa:

"The people changed" ...nope they seem to be the same...the only difference is that they lost the war.

And its simple, you are just too hard headed/stubborn. That's why its a pain for you. You logic is flawed and you just stick with it no matter what.

said the blind man to the deaf.

Smart guy huh?

my logic is fine.. u just don't get it
and yeah its a pain coz u refuse to see things from different angles... its just me, myself and i to u

ur logic works, mine does too... i accept that others think differently to me
i will not force my logic on u no more... and thats the end of that.
i'm getting real sick of this.. i even let u win this (as i usually do)
and yeah.

Excuse me but you didn't let me win. I won. I debated you and killed all your points.

of course u did dear..

Yeah I did. If you cant debate your point anymore, then you failed. Poll this if you want.

of course dear...

Fine debate me if I didn't win.

re-read the 12 pages.. i have nothing more to say