Learn about Islam!

Lol, I can't believe you don't get it. Allah knows all. Allah knows right now, who will go to hell and who will go to Heaven. I guess you would also ask, then why weren't we just put in Haven and Hell. That is because Allah doesn't control you, he just KNOWS what you will do. As for the 50 prayer thing, it's so Allah shows His mercy to all people.

someone shows their mercy by being unreasonable while knowing that its an impossible request then lowering it to the number he knew he would reach all along and making someone ask him 9 times.

that isn't mercy, that is manipulative.

And of course God to you is your 4th grade friend? Anything is reasonable from your creator, which you seem to not get.

"The picture shows the location of the "Rocky belt" which shows that the moon was once split.

The unbelievers of makkah said to the prophet (PBUH) that if you are truely a prophet split the moon and if you do we shall believe. It was a full moon that night...
And so the prophet (PBUH) prayed to Allah (SWT) to grant him his miracle and the moon was split. Half was seen over Mount Saffa and the other half was seen over Mount Kaikaan.

The people said that the Prophet (PBUH) had placed a spell on us, However if he played a trick on us he can't play a trick on ALL the people in the world! Abu Jahl said "let us wait until the people of Albadiyah come and if they see the moon split then it is true and if not its all a a trick of magic.

When the people of Albadiyah came they said that they too saw the moon split and the disbelievers said "oh how powerful Mohammed's magic is".....
===anywayz on with the story===
Then Allah (SWT) revealed the surat Al-Qamar (the moon):: "The hour has come near and the moon has split, and when they see a sign they turn around and say 'this is a continuous magic' and they disbelieved and followed their desires..."

=======
America spent 100 billion U.S dollars on sending a space shuttle to the moon to discover its structure, to compare the structure of the moon to that of the Earth. The scientists said that they were surprised to find a belt of rocks that goes from the surface of the moon to the inner depth. They were quite surprised they gave their findings to their Geologists, who were also quite surprised as they concluded that this couldn't be unless the moon was once split and resealed. The rocks on the belt are a result of the impact during the time in which the two halves of the moon was recombined.

=======
^^^ why spend 100 billion dollars on something when it was all in the Quran??

Mistress of Salamz wrote:

Spoiler:

nice I have a logical explanation though. Know how the moon's gravity pulls at the earth and makes waves? Well the earth's gravity pulls at the moon and moves rocks. seeing as the moon always spins on the same axis it will make an impression like that along the closest part.


as for obeying the creator with my every breath... that doesn't strike me as much of a life. i dont think he would create us only to serve him, it doesn't fit in with my idea of God.

^^^ur explanation doesn't make sense man

which part? i will re-explain it

all of it.. re-explain man..
from da beginning

ok well the earth's gravitational pull moves rocks on the moon.
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/15mar_moonquakes.htm

now i made a mistake earlier saying the moon was spinning, it is but it always has the same side facing the earth, however it is thought to have been spinning before but has been equalised by the earth over time.

the spinning + earth gravity caused the line on the moon.

^^ but how does it cause the moon to split in two..
its not just a superficial line.. it goes right deep into da core...

im not sugesting that it caused the mooon to split in 2, i don't blieve it actually did (it would have crazy gravitational effects i dont think either half would still be in the earths orbit after that weight loss.) and as for going down to the core... it doesnt look like it does. when did they prove that?

it even looks like it could have been caused by a large meteorite a few thousand years ago.

Steve is trying to fool himself.

Speaking about the moon. I just finished Surat Al Qamar (The Moon) today

===evolution===
haha i was so freakin wrong xD
check this out
http://www.darwinconspiracy.com/

are you serious marwa? O.o

i think this site was set up to see what reaction they could get out of people.

yes i'm serious...
it all adds up man...

Mawapasdabutta wrote:===evolution===
haha i was so freakin wrong xD
check this out
http://www.darwinconspiracy.com/

stop being stupid and go read a biology textbook, ANY biology textbook.

preid1220 wrote:

Mawapasdabutta wrote:===evolution===
haha i was so freakin wrong xD
check this out
http://www.darwinconspiracy.com/

stop being stupid and go read a biology textbook, ANY biology textbook.

A-level biologist right here dear... and this stuff makes more sense

ok lets start on #3, the baby one.

of course babies aren't going to be able to survive against adults or animals because they haven't developed yet, but they do have defence mechanisms, "social releasers" these are actions which aid attachment, here your looking at eye contact, cooing, crying, smiling... anything cute.

by being cute they have made it more likely that adults will protect them. With this babies have survived to adulthood.

evolution is all about survival.

but the parents are under developed..

what do you mean?

the parents are underdeveloped...
they aren't good enough to survive in their environment....
init that's what Darwin's theory is based on..survival for the fittest, no??

Mawapasdabutta wrote:the parents are underdeveloped...
they aren't good enough to survive in their environment....
init that's what Darwin's theory is based on..survival for the fittest, no??

they can survie = p
they are adapted there environment = q

we know that
p -> q
p
so we can conclude
q

preid1220 wrote:

Mawapasdabutta wrote:the parents are underdeveloped...
they aren't good enough to survive in their environment....
init that's what Darwin's theory is based on..survival for the fittest, no??

they can survie = p
they are adapted there environment = q

we know that
p -> q
p
so we can conclude
q

^ preid.. Evolution says that the parents are less developed..
the offspring is more advanced/developed to be able to survive in their environment..
read articles #2 and #3 to see why this is wrong...

Mawapasdabutta wrote:

preid1220 wrote:

Mawapasdabutta wrote:the parents are underdeveloped...
they aren't good enough to survive in their environment....
init that's what Darwin's theory is based on..survival for the fittest, no??

they can survie = p
they are adapted there environment = q

we know that
p -> q
p
so we can conclude
q

^ preid.. Evolution says that the parents are less developed..
the offspring is more advanced/developed to be able to survive in their environment..
read articles #2 and #3 to see why this is wrong...

because of minute mutations the children ether stand a better chance or worse chance of surviving. this explains why in snowy areas the color white is much more common in animals than in areas like the rain forest. just because the child is more adapt does not necessarily mean the parents are unable to survive then only the children have a better shot at surviving to adult hood to pass there good genes.

preid1220 wrote:

Mawapasdabutta wrote:

preid1220 wrote:

Mawapasdabutta wrote:the parents are underdeveloped...
they aren't good enough to survive in their environment....
init that's what Darwin's theory is based on..survival for the fittest, no??

they can survie = p
they are adapted there environment = q

we know that
p -> q
p
so we can conclude
q

^ preid.. Evolution says that the parents are less developed..
the offspring is more advanced/developed to be able to survive in their environment..
read articles #2 and #3 to see why this is wrong...

because of minute mutations the children ether stand a better chance or worse chance of surviving. this explains why in snowy areas the color white is much more common in animals than in areas like the rain forest. just because the child is more adapt does not necessarily mean the parents are unable to survive then only the children have a better shot at surviving to adult hood to pass there good genes.

how do these mutations happen Preid??