Hello everyone, sorry being inactive.

I'm curious to see everyone's political stance.

If you're not familiar with what a conservative and liberal's policies are, here are some links...
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=conservative
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=liberal

So, let's hear it.

So basically you are asking if you like having government or not. I impersonally agree with having a government as long as it is a good government, that takes care of its people. Also without a government it will just plain chaos , which is bad . So I voted for liberal.

Ahmed wrote:So basically you are asking if you like having government or not.

No, you misinterpreted pretty badly.

You must be confused with the fact that conservatives like myself like smaller federal government. L+C's only really relates to democracy/republic.

What you were saying is something like anarchy.

0peth wrote:

Ahmed wrote:So basically you are asking if you like having government or not.

No, you misinterpreted pretty badly.

You must be confused with the fact that conservatives like myself like smaller federal government. L+C's only really relates to democracy/republic.

What you were saying is something like .

Ya...........isn't a conservative a ? Whats the difference?

I chose ____________. Why? I basically think that there needs to be a division between government and religion. Basically, on religious grounds(church for example) that church has the right to rule that place while if there is a monument then the government has the right to decide the rules.

Hello Everyone

I am Hassan. This would be my first ever post.

I personally belief that a king with limited powers is better than an elected democrat government. The reason is that history proves that one person rule has prospered, often producing good government for the people. A look at some Mughals, most of the Ottomans, and perhaps even the British monarchy shows that countries were run beautifully and the people often benefited.

Notice that I advocate limited monarchy, where a king is bound to serve the people, and not an absolute one.

Hassan wrote:Hello Everyone

I am Hassan. This would be my first ever post.

I personally belief that a king with limited powers is better than an elected democrat government. The reason is that history proves that one person rule has prospered, often producing good government for the people. A look at some Mughals, most of the Ottomans, and perhaps even the British monarchy shows that countries were run beautifully and the people often benefited.

Notice that I advocate limited monarchy, where a king is bound to serve the people, and not an absolute one.

So...........Hassan you are an conservative like 0peth.

P.S.: Hassan you could introduce yourself in the Introduce forum.

It seems none of you have too much of an idea what either a conservative or liberal is...

Never mind.

i voted for liberal pretty much for the same reason wise did

im neither im independent(the third party)