This is a Hitskin.com skin preview
Install the skin • Return to the skin page
This is a Hitskin.com skin preview
Install the skin • Return to the skin page
Ego Sum Deus wrote:I said I don't care if Raz flamed you first. The fact is, you flamed and you had 6/7 warns. Your flames deserved a 7th warn. You were banned correctly.
Ahmed the IV wrote:Ego Sum Deus wrote:I said I don't care if Raz flamed you first. The fact is, you flamed and you had 6/7 warns. Your flames deserved a 7th warn. You were banned correctly.
My 6 and 7 warnings I got when I replied to "The Tim"'s diss to me and "Raz"'s diss to me. They got no warnings.
Ego Sum Deus wrote:Ahmed the IV wrote:Ego Sum Deus wrote:I said I don't care if Raz flamed you first. The fact is, you flamed and you had 6/7 warns. Your flames deserved a 7th warn. You were banned correctly.
My 6 and 7 warnings I got when I replied to "The Tim"'s diss to me and "Raz"'s diss to me. They got no warnings.
Regardless of whether they were punished or not, I imagine they at least got verbals (How do you know they didn't get warned ). You got punished for a good reason. You flamed.
How can you complain about the reason for your being banned when you readily admit you flamed two people on two seperate occasions, each deserving a warn? This isn't about Raz and Tim, this is about you. You were banned correctly, regardless of what happened to them.
Ahmed the IV wrote:Ego Sum Deus wrote:Ahmed the IV wrote:Ego Sum Deus wrote:I said I don't care if Raz flamed you first. The fact is, you flamed and you had 6/7 warns. Your flames deserved a 7th warn. You were banned correctly.
My 6 and 7 warnings I got when I replied to "The Tim"'s diss to me and "Raz"'s diss to me. They got no warnings.
Regardless of whether they were punished or not, I imagine they at least got verbals (How do you know they didn't get warned ). You got punished for a good reason. You flamed.
How can you complain about the reason for your being banned when you readily admit you flamed two people on two seperate occasions, each deserving a warn? This isn't about Raz and Tim, this is about you. You were banned correctly, regardless of what happened to them.
I dont know that. But i certainly know they didnt get warned becasue their warning number satyed the same.
Before I replied to their rudeness I had reported their posts.
Nothing happned
By all means, I wasnt going to let it happen again.
Ego Sum Deus wrote:Ahmed the IV wrote:Ego Sum Deus wrote:Ahmed the IV wrote:Ego Sum Deus wrote:I said I don't care if Raz flamed you first. The fact is, you flamed and you had 6/7 warns. Your flames deserved a 7th warn. You were banned correctly.
My 6 and 7 warnings I got when I replied to "The Tim"'s diss to me and "Raz"'s diss to me. They got no warnings.
Regardless of whether they were punished or not, I imagine they at least got verbals (How do you know they didn't get warned ). You got punished for a good reason. You flamed.
How can you complain about the reason for your being banned when you readily admit you flamed two people on two seperate occasions, each deserving a warn? This isn't about Raz and Tim, this is about you. You were banned correctly, regardless of what happened to them.
I dont know that. But i certainly know they didnt get warned becasue their warning number satyed the same.
Before I replied to their rudeness I had reported their posts.
Nothing happned
By all means, I wasnt going to let it happen again.
So cussing them out would make them stop? Sounds like a good plan to me... :scratch:
And, do you finally admit that you were banned correctly?
Ego Sum Deus wrote:Yes, all of Sal's is one large conspiracy to root out and set up those that the powerful people do not like.
[/sarcasm]
Ahmed the IV wrote:
No......
I said the authority.
Some Sal members are really decent people.
They saw that I "expressing my freedom too much" so they banned me. Simple.
2nd Admin wrote:how come your not like that on this forum? It would be fun
Ego Sum Deus wrote:Muhammadaw's got closed. I imagine different moderators handled each topic, and one preferred to delete it. I wouldn't know.
Ego Sum Deus wrote:If it got deleted 3 hours later, it was probably to clear out the forum of spam.
A lot of old topics that have been bumped and closed topics that are on the front page are deleted.
Ahmed the IV wrote:Ego Sum Deus wrote:If it got deleted 3 hours later, it was probably to clear out the forum of spam.
A lot of old topics that have been bumped and closed topics that are on the front page are deleted.
They could have deleted the one with the false reasons
Ahmed the IV wrote:Warhead' s topic had the reasons why I was banned.
Some members atrted talking about the corupt Mods at Sals...shouldnt it be clear by now?
I replied, I didnt flame.
Ahmed the IV wrote:Sure, but as I said. Raz dissed me out once. I reported him. He said it again. I think by now itr should have been clear.
What????
What does your example have to do with the topic that Warhead made?
Ego Sum Deus wrote:Ahmed the IV wrote:Sure, but as I said. Raz dissed me out once. I reported him. He said it again. I think by now itr should have been clear.
What????
What does your example have to do with the topic that Warhead made?
What happened to Raz is irrelevent to your banning, you flamed him.
People on Warheads topic, or so you say, started discussing how the Mods of Sals are dictators and are conspiring against you guys.
Ahmed the IV wrote:Ego Sum Deus wrote:Ahmed the IV wrote:Sure, but as I said. Raz dissed me out once. I reported him. He said it again. I think by now itr should have been clear.
What????
What does your example have to do with the topic that Warhead made?
What happened to Raz is irrelevent to your banning, you flamed him.
People on Warheads topic, or so you say, started discussing how the Mods of Sals are dictators and are conspiring against you guys.
What did you expect me to do?
If the authority at Sals actually wanted ot fix their picture, they could have explained why they "rightfully" banned me. But they couldnt because they banned me wrongly. They just deleted it instead. But now the idea will always be with the members that replied to the topic.
Ego Sum Deus wrote:Ahmed the IV wrote:Ego Sum Deus wrote:Ahmed the IV wrote:Sure, but as I said. Raz dissed me out once. I reported him. He said it again. I think by now itr should have been clear.
What????
What does your example have to do with the topic that Warhead made?
What happened to Raz is irrelevent to your banning, you flamed him.
People on Warheads topic, or so you say, started discussing how the Mods of Sals are dictators and are conspiring against you guys.
What did you expect me to do?
If the authority at Sals actually wanted ot fix their picture, they could have explained why they "rightfully" banned me. But they couldnt because they banned me wrongly. They just deleted it instead. But now the idea will always be with the members that replied to the topic.
You still don't understand that regardless of what other people did, you were banned correctly.
If I were, hypothetically, to blatantly insult you, that would deserve a warn. No matter what so said to provoke me. Same thing in your case.
IT DOESN'T MATTER IF YOU WERE PROVOKED OR NOT, THE FACT REMAINS THAT YOU BROKE THE RULES AND DESERVED TO BE BANNED.
How can you not grasp such a simple concept! You break the rules you get punished. Plain and simple.
Ego Sum Deus wrote:Moderators do not live to answer every report immediately. Perhaps none were checking reports or were online at that time?
|
|