Get rid of the old ruling filth. Then we could e constructive.

I am afraid that would have to be done as peacefully as possible..

Nope. The filth should get the necks cut up in a town square.

you know if democracy takes hold in the Muslim world the religion may lose power to the government. Also the USA is on the cutting edge of weapons tech, we are one of the most powerful forces in the world with powerful allies. Egypt is in no way cutting edge nor do they poses the ability to modernize there armories due to poor management.

*Note, most of this comment was assumption brought on by the heat, i may very well be wrong on multiple parts.

Nope. Islam is all about democracy. So it'll strengthen.

democracy is BS anyway

No its not

Sayfullah wrote:democracy is BS anyway

You live in one. Admit it: YOU LOVE IT!!!!

Sayfullah wrote:democracy is BS anyway

they say democracy is the worst type of government, that is if you dont count any of the others.

hell no ive never voted in my life lol ...

nah its not BS but its overrated and annoying

Nope. It's the best IMO

me being the supreme ruler of the world is the best

Me overthrowing you and setting up a global democracy is the best

You failed at that Sayf lol

jj16802 wrote:Me overthrowing you and setting up a global democracy is the best

quite, i do love a good military coup

Democracy is for the dimwitted because that's exactly the masses. They don't have knowledge about political affairs and the great many that do vote aren't even well aware of the person they vote for, just the party and even then they lack the insight required to run a good democracy. Pure democracy will only work with a small group of people. Representative democracy results in a people who are always unhappy.

pure democracy would be voting on every single solitary issue

Then educate them flame.

Democracy is for the dimwitted because that's exactly the masses. They don't have knowledge about political affairs and the great many that do vote aren't even well aware of the person they vote for, just the party and even then they lack the insight required to run a good democracy. Pure democracy will only work with a small group of people. Representative democracy results in a people who are always unhappy.

The masses aren't "dimwitted, my brother. Democracy in essence is compromise and diplomacy. Its the ability to negotiate, to settle on the lesser of the two evils, so to speak. Its the combined support of the majority, along with the political intellect and the ability to manipulate the elite which lets one govern. Unhappy, maybe. Controlled and orderly...most of the time

Ahmed: You can't educate the people who don't want to be educated. As you can see in America, it's mostly foreigners and the poor who take advantage of school. Most Americans who have a stable income have children who don't give a damn and will end up in life as idiots because they never cared.

Controlled and orderly...most of the time

Maybe orderly, but not controlled at all. There is civil hatred all around and large groups face each other. In a democracy, it's the idiots with the loudest voice.

what I mean by controlled was that its not "war" every time some thing opposing happens...its a campaign, its a protest or a rally. I slightly disagree that its only the idiots. The idiots do seem to get the most spotlight but they sure are not the only ones speaking up...

In Egypts case only slaughter will solve problems...trust me.

will it really solve problems?

Yes it will

sorry... slaughter who and why?