to all nonMuslims

what do u think of this retard tom tancredo who advocates bombing the two Holy Cities?

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/7/24/230104.shtml

is this your freedom of religion?

Looks more like the tabloids you find in supermarkets.

this is what results of free speech and ignorance, he obviously does not understand international relationships or middle eastern/south Asian history. I can assure you yo do not need to worry about America bombing Mecca, that is unless you are playing civilization lol. And to finish this up, a quote from Voltaire "I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it."

jj16802 wrote:Looks more like the tabloids you find in supermarkets.

denial?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Tancredo

free speech is just an illusion to incite whatever kind of hatred there is ... and can someone please explain why you can get arrested for "anti semitism" but you are applauded if you attack Islam? or christianity or any other religion?

Noob Killer wrote:

jj16802 wrote:Looks more like the tabloids you find in supermarkets.

denial?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Tancredo

free speech is just an illusion to incite whatever kind of hatred there is ... and can someone please explain why you can get arrested for "anti semitism" but you are applauded if you attack Islam?

I'm not denying, that was just my first impression on the article.

What are tabloids?

small articles with little credibility.

I see...thanks.

preid1220 wrote:this is what results of free speech and ignorance, he obviously does not understand international relationships or middle eastern/south Asian history. I can assure you yo do not need to worry about America bombing Mecca, that is unless you are playing civilization lol. And to finish this up, a quote from Voltaire "I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it."

so you agree that he should be allowed to say this?

to be quite frank, yes. although i personally do not agree with it it is not my place to persecute another mans rites because of it.

so than this principle should also apply if a "Muslim" says he's going to bomb Vatican City? Which will never happen since Muslims are taught to respect all religions .. but this is the problem with freedom of speech

Well by saying that is it like a declaration of war. And hence he could be killed. See what I'm saying?

if he is killed over it it's because Muslims are over reacting, he is a violent little man, but he cant hurt you. to strike him is simple to murder someone because you dont like what they say. Are all Muslims this quick to kill/sin?

Note i am not flaming Islam, i just want to make you think in different ways to broaden both of our views on the subject.

what are you talking about? this clown is an american politician who was running for president!

but was he elected?

Will he could of. Bush got elected.

the fact that he was allowed to run for president says something ..

Bush was a terrorist and thief for example. And the Americans voted him. What does that say about Americans?

bush shouldve been tried for war crimes along with saddam hussein ..

sayf, Ahmed could run for president, it's an option left open for every American.

btw, i could say you are terrorist because your Muslims and all Muslims are terrorist, but is that true? you all ways argue with half sided information that is not even correct of the time.

But instead, Bush is relaxing in his mansion in in Texas. And Saddam Hussein should have never been prosecuted by America. It's none of its business.

america did in fact employ saddam to attack iran ... i guess when they're done with their puppets they kill them

I know. Same for Osama Bin Laden. But I mean, the Iraqis themselves should have prosecuted Saddam. Not the USA.

you support the Dujail massacre?

I don't support any Massacre. Read what I wrote.