War of Words - Lets have some fun with this...

I openly admit to copy and pasting some stuff, so lets do a "copy & paste" argument just for fun. Or come up with your own stuff, but it might be a interesting read nevertheless..lol
Thank you for saying I could come back if I wanted, I really appreciate it. But lets have a war of words right now just for kicks!

So here I am taking time out of my busy schedule to let you and
maybe a few other people know that Mr. Ahmed IV may come to represent
the most insidious corruption of ideals yet. There are a number of
reasons Ahmed IV isn't telling us as to why he wants to turn us into
easy prey for the worst sorts of namby-pamby stumblebums there are. In
this letter, I will expose those reasons one-by-one, on the principle
that it's not the bogeyman that our children need to worry about. It's
Ahmed IV. Not only is Ahmed IV more sneaky and more hypocritical than
any envisaged bogeyman or bugbear, but I have a plan to make this world
a better place in which to live. I call this plan "Operation halt the
destructive process that is carrying our civilization toward
extinction". (Granted, I need a shorter, catchier name but that one
will do for now.) My plan's underlying motif is that Ahmed IV claims
that no one is smart enough to see through his transparent lies. I
would say that that claim is 70% folderol, 20% twaddle, and 10% another
cynical attempt to ridicule the accomplishments of generations of great
men and women.

Don't be fooled: The fact of the matter is that my current plan is
to deal summarily with hate-filled freaks of nature. Yes, he will draw
upon the most powerful fires of Hell to tear that plan asunder, but I
wish I didn't have to be the one to break the news that perception
becomes reality if one is brainwashed for long enough. Nevertheless, I
cannot afford to pass by anything that may help me make my point. So
let me just state that we should mention a bit about pernicious
psychopaths such as Ahmed IV. (Goodness knows, our elected officials
aren't going to.)

Ahmed IV may unwittingly drive us into a state of apoplexy. I say
"unwittingly" because he is apparently unaware that he operates under
the influence of a particular ideology—a set of beliefs based on the
root metaphor of the transmission of forces. Until you understand this
root metaphor you won't be able to grasp why it is immature and stupid
of Ahmed IV to eroticize relations of dominance and subordination. It
would be mature and intelligent, however, to deal with his
irresponsible tactics on a case-by-case basis, and that's why I say
that it has long been obvious to attentive observers that it would be a
strategic blunder of epic proportions for him to disarm us morally,
make us rootless and defenseless, and then destroy us. But did you know
that I challenge Ahmed IV to tell me what, if anything, in this letter
is not entirely truthful? Ahmed IV doesn't want you to know that
because he has delivered exactly the opposite of what he had previously
promised us. Most notably, Ahmed IV's vows of liberation turned out to
be masks for oppression and domination. And, almost as troubling, his
vows of equality did little more than convince people that I have a
scientist's respect for objective truth. That's why I'm telling you
that Ahmed IV takes things out of context, twists them around, and then
neglects to provide decent referencing so the reader can check up on
him. He also ignores all of the evidence that doesn't support (or in
many cases directly contradicts) his position. The bottom line is that
I have put this letter before you, without any gain to myself, because
I care.

i think you are over reacting to Ahmed picking on you, one of the most impotent lessens in life is the lesson of forgiveness.

Watching porn is fine unless it's not children.

(copy and pasted from Sal's, I just had to say that)

Let's not forget he's anti-homosexual too.

Ok, ok, ok. I'll knock it off, I was just having some fun with the online "Insult Generator" I found, I meant no harm, just having some fun at Ahmed IV expense. I'll stop that now.

So hows it going guys? I need to replace my avatar I guess.

Here's the link to the Insult Generator to prove I was only copying and pasting what it wrote, and to prove I'm telling the truth:

http://www.pakin.org/complaint

i tried that on myself and i feel sad now =P

This letter has three main sections. In the first, I argue that only Runawayhorses can praise an institution that is as coprophagous and gruesome as he himself. In the second, I make it clear that Runawayhorses chooses to ignore the fact that his imprecations will send us to Hell in a handbasket by the end of the decade. And in the third and final section, I conclude that he has a hair-trigger temper. The first thing I want to bring up is that he once had the audacity to tell me that he holds a universal license that allows him to popularize a genre of music whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge eccentric dossers to use "pressure tactics"—that's a euphemism for "torture"—to coerce ordinary people into forcing me to go into hiding. My riposte was that he pompously claims that the only way to expand one's mind is with drugs—or maybe even chocolate. That sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately.

I'm sure Runawayhorses wouldn't want me to eavesdrop on his conversations. So why does he want to show a clear lack of respect not just for those brave souls who fought and died for what they believed in but also for you, the readers of this letter? That's the big question. If you knew the answer to that then you'd also know why it would be charitable of me not to mention that Runawayhorses considers it his calling to preach the gospel of interdenominationalism to every living creature. Fortunately, I am not beset by a spirit of false charity so I will instead maintain that we can divide his initiatives into three categories: mendacious, gloomy, and disaffected.

It's not just that Runawayhorses is fixated on despotism but also that his hysteria-producing prophecies are sufficient to give pause to the less thoughtful among us. "Oh, oh," such people think. "We'd better help Runawayhorses pursue a longiloquent agenda under the guise of false concern for the environment, poverty, civil rights, or whatever—just in case." Admittedly, he clings to any argument or principle, however superficial or unprofessional, that appears to support his commentaries. But that's because our situation is snowballing. Am I being unduly harsh for writing that? I think not. When the religious leaders in Jesus's time were wrong, Jesus denounced them in extremely harsh terms. So why shouldn't I, too, use extremely harsh terms to indicate that Runawayhorses and others of his ilk are symbols of passive-aggressive teetotalism? When the war against reason is backed by a large cadre of hectoring dunderheads, the results are even more froward. Period, finis, and Q.E.D.

Nice to see you back Runaway.

And finally you admit it

And no problem.

I did that about New Horizons, lol.

Thanks Ahmed, and I deserved your retort back..lol

Who's that in your picture now?

That's me.

Umm... What is it that makes me not believe you?

Fang wrote:Umm... What is it that makes me not believe you?

+1

Same here...

Because maybe that's CJ Snare? He's the lead singer of the band "Firehouse? I thought you might have know him but apparently not. Hes my avatar at this time anyway.

I was just joking saying its me becuase I thought it would be obvious it's not. it was CJ Snare.

Lol.

Runaway, if you also admire this guy, I strongly advise you not to look at the spoiler!

Spoiler:

He does

Ok, I have a new one, and this one I'm keeping for awhile!..lol

That's emo....

Yes, and exactly why I like it.

What's yours suppose to be anyway, an 18th century trail ride? lmao

runawayhorses wrote:Yes, and exactly why I like it.

That post deserves an award. No joke.

runawayhorses wrote:What's yours suppose to be anyway, an 18th century trail ride? lmao

Fool. Were is the trail? Its obviously a soldier on a a horse otherwise known as cavalry.

Ahmed IV wrote:

runawayhorses wrote:What's yours suppose to be anyway, an 18th century trail ride? lmao

Fool. Were is the trail? Its obviously a soldier on a a horse otherwise known as cavalry.

Because your avatar is really clearly drawn </sarcasm>

I think I can become friends with you fang, I probably misjudged you at the beginning, but I actually think we can get along quite well, you're cool.

However, I need to work on Ahmed IV, I really do like him too but we're having trouble right now..

Fang wrote:

Ahmed IV wrote:

runawayhorses wrote:What's yours suppose to be anyway, an 18th century trail ride? lmao

Fool. Were is the trail? Its obviously a soldier on a a horse otherwise known as cavalry.

Because your avatar is really clearly drawn </sarcasm>

I didn't draw it

Fine, Ill get a clearer one to please the ones whom have eye problems

a problem lies with the party not the person