WWlll might just happen

Going off-topic is angianst the rules

Edited by: Internal

Reason: You went off topic first

only flame2 wrote:Exactly and whats odd is that I don't think Bush relized that Iraq could have hid them in other countries.

That is because when Bill Clinton was the president and pulled out secret agents in Iraq.

only flame2 wrote:Exactly and whats odd is that I don't think Bush relized that Iraq could have hid them in other countries.

well i think he did know because we couldn't enter Iraq until our congress said we could thats one part of their job.

Too much thinking

P.S internal go to chat

Uh, no.

Here is why...

America is specifically pissing off private cults and or organizations in the Middle East.

Whether or not Turkey goes to war, the war will not go beyond Turkey, America, and the Middle East. Asia does not want in, and the only country in Europe in all likelihood I'd imagine would participate would be Turkey.

America will not be pulling out of Iraq now, especially since we are still there for the same reason we have always had relations with these people. We need oil until we find alternative energy. If we pull out, there will eventually be a loss in oil for America. HOWEVER, there is a lot of oil in Alaska, which of course belongs to America...

what proof do you have that we are in this war oil because i have never seen any that wasent based off of suspition. of couse it is benafitil but that is still up to Iraq to decide if they want to give us their oil.

only flame2 wrote:Also India and Iraq have had many problems so India might get involved. America should (and I would be shocked if we didn't) fire nukes at Iraq. They're nothing more than a terrorist country to us, to Turkey and India :x

fireing a nuke is a big nono Think about how we wuld look if we fired a nuke on a land that "can't defend it's self." To the world we wuld look like monsters and even owere alies will go to the enimeys side.

currently the united states has the most nuclear weapons

Nope, this honer belong's to Rusha

there is a lot of oil in Alaska, which of course belongs to America...

What are you thinking! Do you wan't to destroy alaska? the reason we are over ther is because bush is a Idiot.

preid1220 wrote:

only flame2 wrote:Also India and Iraq have had many problems so India might get involved. America should (and I would be shocked if we didn't) fire nukes at Iraq. They're nothing more than a ist country to us, to Turkey and India :x

fireing a nuke is a big nono Think about how we wuld look if we fired a nuke on a land that "can't defend it's self." To the world we wuld look like monsters and even owere alies will go to the enimeys side.

Doesn't the world already view America as a Monster?

With Bush in charge yes, get rid of him wed be fine <_<

Rothes wrote:With Bush in charge yes, get rid of him wed be fine <_<

Yep, you got the flow.........

At least he ca't run this time. Though the new candidates arn't any better then him.

Rothes wrote:At least he ca't run this time. Though the new candidates arn't any better then him.

Yes you really cant decide know if someone is a good candidate or not

wate if you live in egypt how can you say anything about the curant gov.? If you want to debate the gov. make a new thread this is going of topic let's just get back to ww3.

preid1220 wrote:wate if you live in egypt how can you say anything about the curant gov.? If you want to debate the gov. make a new thread this is going of topic let's just get back to ww3.

Lol, I am from Egypt I live in America though .

ok so you are liveing in america at the time. but it is the idiot bushes falt for how people seam like in the U.S.A

preid1220 wrote:ok so you are liveing in america at the time. but it is the idiot bushes falt for how people seam like in the U.S.A

yes, I live in America currently. Also yes I know that .

The government of countries has to do with WWlll so it isn't like we'r going off topic preid, seriusly spell check more often too preid

You know that's not like me
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I went to mass and the preast was talking about the gov. :affraid: If it has reached this far then nucler winter is right around the corner

Nope, this honer belong's to Rusha (quoting preid1220)

this is not true we have the most nukes out of all countrys because when the USSR split all there silos were lost countrys were created and those silos were in those countrys borders (no longer owned buy rusha) plus we are the only country still cappible of creating these weapons because rusha is just picking up the peices of its previous empire witch was a super power

and by the way if Bush is an idiot than everyone in the country is too because we voted for him TWICE. secondly who are you to say hes an idiot are you a president do you keep this country running its harder to be a president now than it was to be 9 years ago at least he has maintained this country for 2 consecutive terms.

Maintaned? He practicaly embarrassed himself at every turn. He mde flase promises and so on, i'd go into further detail but i'm on the clock.

Also Big B, how do you know that he didn't cheat the elections? It did happen in America's history before, you know.

I beleave bush did lose the popular vote. You see bush is a tabaco chewing, hog chasing, sister dating idiot in my book. The gov. put in place a voting sistem in witch the us ppl don't realy get to vote. In the contry's erley day's we were a bunch of weat picking farmers covered in durt and to make sure one of them didant bacome the presidant they made it so the higher up hold the most power. i can't go into 2 much detal because i'm to layze to read my history text book.

Who can vote on this forum? who actualy spends the time to read about each canadit? who has voted befor? who dosent listen to others and makes their own conclusions about the current president?

well im sure that when you guys can vote you will be in the same position im in defending a president that was freely elected. One thing about elections that you proboly dont know is that they are not won by popular vote the winning votes are not up to the puplic. does anyone know who decides the outcome of an election?

The peopel do, the system works like this. Each state has different population correct? Well each state has a certaint amount of total voting power. Lets say that NY voted mostly for bush, then the state's points would go to bush. Each state has points based on pop. these points are given to the candidate that the state wanted the most. So in actuality it's majority rules not whoever wants who.

Big B you just asked if anyone knew what i sead in the post before yours >.<